When a trademark application faces objections under Section 11, it typically involves conflicts with existing marks that could cause public confusion. To address this, start by differentiating the applied mark from cited marks based on various factors such as color, font, and overall impression. Next, research the status and history of cited marks and the details of the applied mark, including usage and supporting evidence.

Draft a structured reply addressing specific objections, comparing marks, and citing relevant case laws, such as “Nandhini Deluxe v. Karnataka Co-Operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd” and “SABEL v. Puma.” Include a table comparing cited and applied marks, and conclude with a prayer and signature. Submit the reply with a digital signature after thorough review. This process ensures a comprehensive and well-supported response to trademark objections.